Facts:
The Veterinary Medicine programme was last evaluated in 2017 and 2018. Here you will find the reports from the evaluation:
Here you will find the decision and reports from the ongoing evaluation:
Every seven years, our Veterinary Medicine programme undergoes evaluation to maintain our European accreditation. An evaluation process is ongoing.
Our Veterinary Medicine programme is accredited following the standards set by the European Association of Establishments for Veterinary Education (EAEVE). The standard is based on minimum requirements stipulated by the European Union.
Accreditation is a sign of our programme’s quality and enables our graduates to practise and continue their professional development in a competitive market anywhere in Europe. Accreditation also provides us with the possibility of offering specialist European programmes approved by the European Board of Veterinary Specialisation (EBVS).
EAEVE follows an evaluation system to ensure the following:
This information about the progress of the process is continuously updated. Further details about the accreditation itself and information about members of the working group can be found further down in the FAQ.
We have now received the European Committee of Veterinary Education's (ECOVE) official decision on the European accreditation of our veterinary programme and their Final Visitation Report. You will find the documents in the fact box further down the page.
As expected, we have been given the status of Pending Accreditation, which gives us until March 18, 2026 to fix the major deficiencies, arrange a re-visitation and get a new decision from ECOVE. For this to be possible, the re-visitation must take place in October 2025.
The faculty management is determined that the programme should be accredited. We need to move forward together, with a united force, to solve this with existing conditions.
ECOVE has identified two major deficiencies as follows:
1. the VEE (Veterinary Education Establishment) is not compliant with Standard 9.2. because the number and range of skills of teaching staff at the VTH-pet clinic are insufficient.
2. the VEE is not compliant with Standard 9.4 because of insufficient involvement of teaching staff in designing the VTH's contribution to clinical teaching and research and in its day-to-day management.
The standard they refer to can be found in the Standard Operation Procedure document (page 29).
Our Full Visitation Working Group and the Faculty's management will now analyse the final report with the support of other functions to ensure that we address this in the best possible way. The mentioned deficiencies were identified and communicated to us already at the time of the Full Visitation in March. Work for the re-visitation is therefore already underway.
While the major deficiencies are being addressed, our program remains accredited. The pending accreditation status does not affect our students' ability to work in the EU and the UK, nor does it affect their chances of being admitted to specialist programs (Diplomates).
The EAEVE/ESEVT evaluation team visited us, 18-22 March, to assess the veterinary programme. They met with numerous students, teachers, and other staff members to gain a thorough understanding of our operations and the conditions for education.
On Friday, 22 March, the evaluation team held an Exit Presentation, where they summarised their observations.
We received a lot of praise for large parts of the programme, including supportive environment, good interaction between teachers and students, and appropriate infrastructure. We received some minor deficiencies that can be addressed directly, such as signage to isolation boxes. They found two major deficiencies that remains in the advance notice (see above).
The following working group was tasked with conducting the visit and ensuring that the evaluation team was provided with all relevant facts. They will also analyse the final report.
The evaluation team consisted of the following individuals:
In addition, Professor Emerita Roseanne Taylor, from Australia, participated to observe whether EAEVE's accreditation can serve as a basis for licensure in Australia and New Zealand. Representatives from the Swedish Board of Agriculture also participated as they are the responsible authority for Swedish veterinary licensure.
On 7th August we received the happy news that our veterinary program is accredited by The Australasian Veterinary Boards Council (AVBC). This accreditation means that veterinarians trained with us, who graduate from 2024 onwards, are eligible for authorisation to work in Australia and New Zealand.
The accreditation is valid for 7 years, after which a new evaluation will be carried out.
Accreditation is a sign of our programme’s quality. It enables our graduates to practise and continue their professional development in a competitive market anywhere in Europe.
Accreditation also provides us with the possibility of offering specialist European programmes approved by the European Board of Veterinary Specialisation (EBVS). The specialist programmes are divided into a one-year internship and three-year residency. You can read more on Specialist Education – EBVS - European Board of Veterinary Specialists.
Hypothetically, SLU could provide a veterinary program without being EAEVE accredited, as long as we are authorized by the Swedish Board of Agriculture. However, this is not an option. We need to be EAEVE accredited to be able to offer European specialist programs approved by the European Board of Veterinary Specialisation (EBVS).
Our current status is Pending Accreditation and it extends until March 2026.
The veterinary programme accreditation process follows clear process with compulsory components stipulated in the standard operating procedure (SOP) which is summarised below.
Request for full visitation – The institution must first apply to be evaluated. In December 2022, SLU applied to undergo evaluation for continued accreditation.
Self-evaluation report (SER) – The institution will then self-evaluate and summarise this in a report. You can find SLU's Self-Evaluation Report (SER) a bit further down in the information box.
Full visitation – An evaluation team, appointed by EAEVE, visits the institution to evaluate the education on-site. This should be carried out when the educational activities are in full swing, meaning when most staff and students are present.
Visitation report – After the visit, the delegation writes a report, which includes recommendations among other things. Within 14 days after the evaluation is completed, we have the opportunity to read the report and correct any factual errors.
ECOVE decision – The European Committee of Veterinary Education (ECOVE) then meets and decides on the accreditation, based on the institution's self evaluation and the recommendations of the evaluation team's report. If they find that the institution has one or more major deficiencies, the institution is given the status of Pending Accreditation. If the institution is found to comply with the standard, it is given the status of Accredited. Decisions are communicated within two days of the meeting.
Re-visitation – In case of Pending Accreditation status, a re-visitation shall be arranged, to evaluate whether the deficiencies have been corrected. ECOVE then makes a new decision. This must take place within two years after the Full Visitation.
While the major deficiencies are being addressed, the programme remains accredited. The pending accreditation status does not affect the students' ability to work in the EU and the UK, nor does it affect their chances of being admitted to specialist programs (Diplomates).
If the veterinary education establishment chooses not to rectify the shortcomings, or if we do not follow the regulations for re-visitation, they will automatically be allocated the ‘non-accredited’ status.
If the European Committee of Veterinary Education (ECOVE) were to assess that we have one or more major deficiencies, we will be given the status of Pending Accreditation. We must then correct the deficiencies, conduct a Re-visitation and get a new decision within 2 years. Pending Accreditation status is equivalent to being accredited. You can read more about this under the question How does accreditation work?
The faculty management is determined that the program should be accredited.
The basic requirement is that newly graduated veterinary surgeons from the programme are to have ‘day one competences’ meaning they are safe and competent to practise on the first day after completing their studies. There are further formal requirements that must be met to obtain accreditation.
The University Animal Hospital (UDS) and VH Faculty must be one unit, both in terms of the organisation and finances and it must have a common strategy for the Veterinary Medicine programme. The integration of UDS and VH faculty as of January 1, 2024, addresses this requirement. The UDS operations are added as an appendix to the faculty's strategy for the period 2021-2025.
The programme director of studies must be a veterinary surgeon; at SLU this is Senior Lecturer Helene Hamlin. UDS must also have a chief veterinary officer; at SLU this is Bodil Ström Holst, Head of Department and Maria Svensson, Deputy Head of Department for Animal Care.
Students must have experience of working with emergency cases, both in the evenings and during the night. Their tasks must include stabilising animals, pain relief, palliative care and euthanasia. The University Animal Hospital must therefore be in operation 24 hours a day, 7 days a week during the semester. The University Animal Hospital must have an on-call service for admitting sick small animals and horses around the clock.
There are requirements on how many patients students must work with during their studies. Together with those responsible for each organisation, the workgroup will conduct an inventory to determine whether we already meet the targets for each species, or if action needs to be taken. There are established targets for both pre-clinical (pathology) and clinical settings for both working and companion animals as well as animals raised for food.
The following areas will be evaluated as part of the accreditation process:
We learnt a great deal from the previous accreditation process, which resulted in SLU being without accreditation for a period. This time, we placed a lot of focus on the internal preparatory process, where we worked with our self-evaluation report in a completely different way.
University management will receive regular information about the process. The work group will continually consult with faculty management on how to rectify any shortcomings that come to light.
A workgroup is leading the accreditation process at SLU. Professor Ivar Vågsholm has been appointed the liaison officer for visitation. He must ensure that we follow the implementation of EAEVE’s standard operating procedure (SOP). He is also responsible for a number of practicalities related to the evaluation.
Professor Henrik Rönnberg is in charge of writing and approval of our self-evaluation report.
The workgroup also includes representatives from VMF and SLUSS. Linda Ferngren will provide the group with administrative support.
The workgroup is responsible for the process and evaluation – not for ensuring that the organisation will meet the EAEVE standards. There will be dialogues with the responsible managers to work with any problem areas in order to guarantee SLU’s accreditation.
The following people have an advisory role and must be kept informed throughout the process:
The Veterinary Medicine programme was last evaluated in 2017 and 2018. Here you will find the reports from the evaluation:
Here you will find the decision and reports from the ongoing evaluation:
You can send any questions you may have about the accreditation process to internkommunikation@slu.se. The FAQ will be updated as necessary.